April 2014 Odds
Very little in this world is certain, and therefore it is difficult
to be absolutely certain of many aspects of 9/11. Moreover, my ideas for
what happened on 9/11 have evolved over the years. The following are how I rate various
aspects of 9/11, in terms of probability (I define "Beyond any
reasonable doubt" as odds of 10,000 to 1 or higher):
1) Some officials in the US government had specific foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
2) Some officials in the US government aided the hijackers at various points before 9/11: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
3) Some officials in the US government had a direct hand in carrying out the attacks: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
4) Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
5) No aircraft hit the Pentagon at all: 10 to 1
6) Pre-planted explosives destroyed the WTC (1, 2, 7) towers: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
7) Nuclear weapons were involved in the destruction of the WTC (1, 2, 7) towers: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
8) no plane crashed at all in Shanksville and the crash site was a complete hoax: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
9) UA93 did not crash in Shanksville: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
10) flight 11 did not hit WTC1: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
11) flight 175 did not hit WTC2: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
12) at least some videos and photos of the second hit were faked: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
13) Bush had some specific foreknowledge about what was going to happen on 9/11: 10 to 1
14) The air defense (NORAD) response to the hijackings was distracted and/or disabled by wargames being run on 9/11: even (since lack of real hijacked planes would have been as much of a factor)
15) The four 9/11 "crashes" did not involve any conventional planes (includes real plane parts used to mimic crashes, and that planes were used indirectly as decoys): "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
16) There is a cover-up/disinfo campaign about 9/11 being maintained by the government: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
17) There is a cover-up about 9/11 being maintained at high levels by the media: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
1) Some officials in the US government had specific foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
2) Some officials in the US government aided the hijackers at various points before 9/11: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
3) Some officials in the US government had a direct hand in carrying out the attacks: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
4) Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
5) No aircraft hit the Pentagon at all: 10 to 1
6) Pre-planted explosives destroyed the WTC (1, 2, 7) towers: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
7) Nuclear weapons were involved in the destruction of the WTC (1, 2, 7) towers: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
8) no plane crashed at all in Shanksville and the crash site was a complete hoax: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
9) UA93 did not crash in Shanksville: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
10) flight 11 did not hit WTC1: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
11) flight 175 did not hit WTC2: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
12) at least some videos and photos of the second hit were faked: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
13) Bush had some specific foreknowledge about what was going to happen on 9/11: 10 to 1
14) The air defense (NORAD) response to the hijackings was distracted and/or disabled by wargames being run on 9/11: even (since lack of real hijacked planes would have been as much of a factor)
15) The four 9/11 "crashes" did not involve any conventional planes (includes real plane parts used to mimic crashes, and that planes were used indirectly as decoys): "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
16) There is a cover-up/disinfo campaign about 9/11 being maintained by the government: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
17) There is a cover-up about 9/11 being maintained at high levels by the media: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"
posted by spooked at 6:07 AM
0 comments
